WARNING: This is the _old_ Lustre wiki, and it is in the process of being retired. The information found here is all likely to be out of date. Please search the new wiki for more up to date information.
Lustre Publications: Difference between revisions
From Obsolete Lustre Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* attachment | * attachment | ||
* we are doing poorly on 64k random reads, panasas does much better. | * we are doing poorly on 64k random reads, panasas does much better. | ||
== Cray User Group == | |||
* XT7? Integrating and Operating a Conjoined XT3+XT4 System | |||
** Presentation: Presented by ORNL on CUG 2007 | |||
** Paper:This paper describes the processes and tools used to move production work from the pre-existing XT3 to the new system incorporating that same XT3, including novel application of Lustre routing capabilities. | |||
** docs on CUG site [http://www.cug.org/5-members_only/1-attendees/proceedings_attendee_lists/2007CD/S07_Proceedings/pages/Authors/Canon/Canon_paper.pdf Paper] [http://www.cug.org/5-members_only/1-attendees/proceedings_attendee_lists/2007CD/S07_Proceedings/pages/Authors/Canon/Canon_slides.pdf Presentation] | |||
== HEPiX Talks == | == HEPiX Talks == | ||
* [https://indico.desy.de/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=257&showDate=all&showSession=all&detailLevel=contribution&viewMode=plain Spring HEPiX 2007]: April 23-27, 2007 | * [https://indico.desy.de/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=257&showDate=all&showSession=all&detailLevel=contribution&viewMode=plain Spring HEPiX 2007]: April 23-27, 2007 | ||
* [https://indico.desy.de/getFile.py/access?contribId=26&sessionId=40&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=257 Storage Evaluations at BNL] | * [https://indico.desy.de/getFile.py/access?contribId=26&sessionId=40&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=257 Storage Evaluations at BNL] | ||
** Robert Petkus - BNL | ** Presented by Robert Petkus - BNL | ||
** Performance comparison between ZFS, XFS and EXT3 (unfortunately not EXT4) on a Sun Thumper | ** Performance comparison between ZFS, XFS and EXT3 (unfortunately not EXT4) on a Sun Thumper | ||
** | ** Slides on HPPix site: [https://indico.desy.de/getFile.py/access?contribId=26&sessionId=40&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=257] | ||
** J-Ch Lafoucriere | * [http://wiki.lustre.org/images/5/58/DIF.pdf Lustre Experience at CEA/DIF] | ||
** | ** Presented by J-Ch Lafoucriere | ||
** Slides on HEPix site: [https://indico.desy.de/getFile.py/access?contribId=44&sessionId=39&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=257 Lustre Experience at CEA/DIF] | |||
Revision as of 04:02, 22 May 2007
Caspur (CERN)
- attachment
- we are doing poorly on 64k random reads, panasas does much better.
Cray User Group
- XT7? Integrating and Operating a Conjoined XT3+XT4 System
- Presentation: Presented by ORNL on CUG 2007
- Paper:This paper describes the processes and tools used to move production work from the pre-existing XT3 to the new system incorporating that same XT3, including novel application of Lustre routing capabilities.
- docs on CUG site Paper Presentation
HEPiX Talks
- Spring HEPiX 2007: April 23-27, 2007
- Storage Evaluations at BNL
- Presented by Robert Petkus - BNL
- Performance comparison between ZFS, XFS and EXT3 (unfortunately not EXT4) on a Sun Thumper
- Slides on HPPix site: [1]
- Lustre Experience at CEA/DIF
- Presented by J-Ch Lafoucriere
- Slides on HEPix site: Lustre Experience at CEA/DIF
Karlsruhe Lustre Talks
- http://www.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de/dienste/lustretalks.php
- Six talks in PDF
- Einführungsveranstaltung im Rechenzentrum (2005):
- HP-CAST 4 in Krakau (10.5.2005):
- ISC 2005 in Heidelberg (24.6.2005):
- HP-CAST 5 in Seattle (11.11.2005):
- HP-CCN in Seattle (12.11.2005):
- SGPFS 5 in Stuttgart (4.4.2006):
Ohio State University
- Lustre performance comparison when using InfiniBand and Quadrics interconnects
- Download paper at OSU site: [2]
- attachment:
University of Boulder, Colorado
- LCI paper: attachment:
- Note that when a single client gets exclusive access GPFS wins
- Single client reads (we are very poor): remedy - tune
- Creates in a unique directory per client: remedy - memory WB cache
- The management issues mentioned in the last part of this paper are being addressed
- [3](It's the same as the attachment of LCI paper above.)
University of Minnesota
- attachment:MSST-2006-paper.pdf
